米妮Minnie_OKX

"After watching your content, everything is under control" Minnie emphasizes that after receiving @, everyone gets a share 😂 Here’s a reminder for everyone, besides the [Creator Incentive], @OKX星球 also has a hidden benefit on the way 📩 🎁 Simply put: as long as your content is exciting enough, it doesn't matter the interaction rate, the number of likes, or the follower count! (Mention us in the comments so we can see) You have a chance to receive gifts from @OKX星球 Detailed event information here 👉 https://oyidl.me/ul/TSvG9ed Looking forward to seeing the excellent you, let's not miss any good ideas 📖

WSJ suddenly attacks stablecoins, the timing is too coincidental 🧐 #稳定币叙事之战 Who is controlling this narrative battle? On May 25, the chief economic commentator of The Wall Street Journal published an article labeling USDT/USDC as "private money," citing that 84% of illegal activities are related to stablecoins, concluding that the GENIUS Act cannot solve the fundamental problem. Timing: Less than three months left before Congress recesses in August, the legislative sprint window is tight. Coincidence? Too coincidental! 👀 How Coinbase responded The policy head directly dismantled the argument: 90% of the US M2 money supply is already composed of private liabilities, the GENIUS Act clearly requires 1:1 reserves and prohibits leverage, so the historical risks WSJ worries about simply do not apply under the current framework. The rebuttal logic is clear, but the issue is not who is right; lawmakers pay attention to WSJ, not Coinbase’s policy brief. ➤ Who benefits the most? The most direct beneficiaries are the traditional banking system. Once stablecoins gain a compliant framework, they can replace some bank deposit functions in payments, cross-border settlements, and other scenarios. The banking lobby’s influence in Washington is well known; during the legislative sprint, using mainstream media to raise doubts is the lowest-cost and most effective way to influence legislation. ➤ Another beneficiary is the anti-crypto political forces. "Even The Wall Street Journal says there’s a problem" carries more weight in hearings than any academic report. The essence of the narrative is timing; the 84% statistic is not new data, nor is the private money attribute of stablecoins a new topic. ❓ Why release it now? Why at the critical moment of the legislative sprint? Media independent judgment and interest groups leveraging it are not mutually exclusive. An article can simultaneously be a truthful news judgment and objectively serve the goals of certain interest groups. Whether the GENIUS Act can pass before August now has an additional variable. In this narrative battle over stablecoins, the crypto industry is fighting not only on technology and compliance but also for discourse power in Washington. Do you think this WSJ article will affect the legislative outcome? 👇

Are you happy with your $OKB holdings today? 😁 Come on, let's post and discuss your position together.

Actually, the backend receives many messages from friends, but Nini's messages are a bit too many, and many questions are so subjective that they are difficult to answer 😮‍💨 Here, I will answer some of the "subjective" doubts from friends 🤔 Q1. Minnie, why have I recently posted @operations but haven't received any likes? 🔹Because I will like and comment on [original] content that resonates with me. For AI-generated content, let's just wait and see for a while. Don't doubt the judgment ability of operations; after all, the daily reading volume 📖 is huge! Q2. Why do I keep "writing writing writing" but the traffic is not good? 🔸From Minnie's purely subjective preference, with the accumulation of quantity, maybe one post will occasionally get a boost in traffic, but if you can maintain a sincere sharing state, even if your daily creations are limited, operations will notice you and look forward to your posts~ So, as always, content is king! You said, "Since ancient times, true feelings can't be kept, only tricks win people's hearts." I think, "Only sincerity is the ultimate weapon 🩷"

#HYPE多空决战：最大空头爆仓删号 The largest short position wiped out with a loss of 31 million and then deleted the account to escape. In this era of on-chain transparency, is there still a future for shorting? HYPE broke through $61 to hit a new all-time high, playing out a textbook long-short battle on-chain 👇 🔹The protagonist loracle, the largest contract short of $HYPE, with an unrealized loss exceeding 31 million, was forced to liquidate at $60.2 this morning, confirming a loss of 6.99 million, then deleted the X account. 🔸On the other side stands: a16z-related whale who cumulatively bought 3.17 million tokens with an unrealized profit of 33 million, and Grayscale bought 680,000 tokens worth about $37 million in one week. Retail investors squeezed shorts, institutions built positions, shorts had no counterattack. ▪️On-chain position transparency is the Achilles' heel of shorting In traditional markets, shorting is an information game: you discover problems others haven't, quietly build positions, and profit when the market catches up. Positions are secret, a moat. ▪️On-chain there are no secrets Every position, every margin top-up, every liquidation price of loracle is fully public in real time. Everyone knows where he is, his liquidation line, and the price point that will trigger his liquidation. This is not shorting; it's hiding money in a glass house. ⭕️Transparency itself becomes a hunting tool Loracle didn't lose to HYPE's fundamentals; he lost to transparency itself. On-chain shorting is not without a way out, but the rules have changed: once a position is established, it becomes a target. The only solution is: be fast enough and dispersed enough. 📌Conclusion: Holding tens of millions of dollars in short positions with a single large account on-chain is almost a guaranteed way to get slaughtered. The moment loracle deleted the account shows he himself realized this. It’s not a wrong judgment, it’s choosing the wrong battlefield 😂

🍕 The OKX Pizza Festival is officially underway, featuring multiple activities and a prize pool of 18.88 BTC to share! Multiple ways to play: 🔹 Hash Prediction: Trade 500U, predict the correct block hash, and share 2 BTC 🔹 Pizza Card Collection: Collect all ingredients to unlock exclusive rewards, prize pool 15.88 BTC 🔹 Hash Lucky Draw: Successfully collect pizza cards for a chance to enter the hash lucky draw and win 1 BTC Event duration: May 21 - May 29 → Click to participate https://oyidl.me/ul/OxisZ9 On May 22, 2010, someone bought two pizzas for 10,000 $BTC. In 2026, OKX decided to give away 18.88 BTC during the Pizza Festival. How will you celebrate this year's Pizza Festival? Post with #加密人怎么过披萨节 and tag @OKX中文 three times for a chance to win an exclusive OKX Pizza Festival gift box~

Oh ho ho, there will be a little surprise tomorrow Friendly reminder: [Creator Star Phase 3] @OKX星球 #创作者激励 Another wonderful/busy Wednesday🌹

#三星罢工倒计时：KOSPI熔断，日损$7亿 Samsung chip workers strike, will AI computing power expansion be affected? 🔒 Locked on May 21, about 45,000 Samsung chip workers will start a full strike, with the HBM core production line expected to halt, causing a daily loss of about $700 million. KOSPI 200 futures directly triggered a -5% circuit breaker. Let's first take a deep dive into the related issues⬇️ Q: What is HBM❓ Why is it important❓ A: HBM (High Bandwidth Memory) is the core component of AI training chips like Nvidia's H100 and H200. Without HBM, a GPU is an incomplete chip. ➤ Currently, the global HBM market is dominated by Samsung and SK Hynix, together supplying over 90%. A shutdown of Samsung's HBM production line means a supply chain gap in the core components relied upon for global AI computing power expansion. Q: How does the transmission chain work❓ A: The supply shock won't immediately affect Nvidia's deliveries on day one; the chip supply chain has inventory buffers, usually lasting 4 to 8 weeks. ➤ But if the strike lasts more than a month, the following will happen⬇️ HBM production capacity declines → Nvidia GPU stock tightens → Data center delivery cycles lengthen → AI infrastructure construction delays → Cloud providers' computing power expansion plans are hindered Microsoft, Google, and Amazon's capital expenditure plans this year heavily depend on GPU delivery schedules; any delay will be reflected in their financial reports. What we need to watch is: how long the strike will last. Currently, the South Korean Prime Minister has held an emergency meeting, Chairman Lee Jae-yong has publicly apologized, and government-mandated mediation options are still on the table. Historically, large industrial strikes in South Korea last on average 2 to 3 weeks, but this time the union is tough, and negotiations have not made substantial progress yet. If the strike starts as scheduled on the 21st and lasts more than 4 weeks, the pressure on AI computing power supply will begin to show in the market by mid-June. The impact of this event won't be seen today, but the supply chain clock has already started ticking. Do you think this strike will disrupt the expansion pace of AI infrastructure?👇

Gather round🍕 Pizza Festival, meme creators hurry up‼️ The OKX Planet meme contest has begun, who will be the Pizza Festival "God of Abstraction"? Come create now～ Post with #OKXPizzaDay and @OKX星球, jokes, memes, Meme, abstract literature all welcome! Top quality content selected daily and pinned, plus USDT, OKX merchandise waiting for you 🚀 Event details🔗: https://oyidl.net/ul/nErPHA4 "$BTC "

Busy Wednesday / Exciting Wednesday / Wednesday much loved by Libra 😂 #OKXPizzaDay Lightly looking forward to the event!

#矿企Q1集体亏损转型AI求生 Mining companies collectively pivot to AI amid Q1 losses Are BTC hashrate security issues looming with miners shifting to AI? Q1 earnings season saw miners making their moves, all reporting losses 😂 ➤ MARA net loss $1.3B, CleanSpark net loss $378M, Keel net loss $145M All three coincidentally announced shifts to AI/HPC; mining is too tough, selling hashrate to AI firms is more lucrative 😅 🤨 What’s driving this shift? Mining revenue is shrinking, costs aren’t dropping. BTC price is underwater, network difficulty keeps rising, mined coins are fewer. Using the same facilities and power, serving AI companies is far more profitable than mining BTC. Changing direction is a rational choice, not a betrayal. ❓Q: Will this shift affect BTC hashrate security? ❗️A: No worries～ ➤ Currently, the shift to AI mainly involves old mining rigs that are high-cost and low-efficiency. Their hashrate exiting essentially cleans out inefficient capacity, leaving behind miners with lower costs and higher efficiency. Historically, when China banned mining entirely, the network hashrate halved overnight, yet BTC kept running, and hashrate fully recovered within two months. 👀 A drop in total hashrate doesn’t equal network security collapse. In fact, the real concern is that after miners exit, mining will concentrate increasingly in a few large, low-cost operators. Higher hashrate concentration = lower network decentralization This isn’t an immediate threat but a structural change worth monitoring long-term. Miners pivoting is market-driven elimination, not a doomsday signal for $BTC～👇